tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-13358611.post8973678152468056171..comments2023-10-25T14:20:11.408-05:00Comments on RHOBLOGY: EvilBible.com Project, Part 3 - Synthetic LifeRhologyhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/14245825667079220242noreply@blogger.comBlogger1125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-13358611.post-68263793810899543672009-06-08T14:58:49.506-05:002009-06-08T14:58:49.506-05:00Rho:
Point is, it's still a controversy, 7 y...Rho: <br /><br /><b>Point is, it's still a controversy, 7 years after the study EB.com cites.</b> <br /><br />The paper <i>Ten reasons to exclude viruses from the tree of life</i> was published in <i>Nature Reviews Microbiology</i> April 2009. <br /><br />Rho: <br /><br /><b>3) EB.com no doubt believes that this experiment is evidence that life does not require a God to create it, ...</b> <br /><br />What experiment? The paper was an <a href="http://www.nature.com/nrmicro/journal/v7/n4/abs/nrmicro2108.html" rel="nofollow"> OPINION</a> piece. <br /><br />Rho: <br /><br /><b>At any rate, though evidencing an intelligent designer is not identical to evidencing the God of the Bible, it lends support thereto rather than chipping at its foundation.</b> <br /><br />Not identical? That's an understatement. An intelligently designed car, life form, etc., offers zero support for a supernatural entity.NALhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/12244370945682162312noreply@blogger.com