As promised, this is the place to leave your comments about the debate. To help keep track of the chronological order of events and posts, I'll jump in and leave a comment that links to every new post in the debate.
"Well, what do you think was happening, in that case, in Galatians 2?"
Just pointing out that occasional infallibility is no infallibility whatsoever.
Perhaps you need a new model for infallibility. Like oh say, infallibility in the consensus of the church? Like, that was how the Jerusalem council was able to pronounce something that seemed to be contrary to the scriptures.
If your model of infallibility doesn't work, time to reconsider?
I was originally going to post a comment asking if there was a place to see DavidW's arguments, as his linked blog is no longer online, nor is it available via archive.org. However, shortly beforehand, I actually did manage to find it, sort of. It was moved to "piousfabrications.com" (rather than "piousfabrications.blogspot.com") which is also no longer available but its articles at least seem to be preserved on archive.org. So if you want to find them, swap out "piousfabrications.blogspot.com" with "piousfabrications.com" (leave the rest of the URL intact), then go to archive.org and put that URL in. So, for example, his opening statement links to: http://piousfabrications.blogspot.com/2009/08/sola-scriptura-debate-opening-statement.html
So if you do what I suggested, you will end up with: http://piousfabrications.com/2009/08/sola-scriptura-debate-opening-statement.html
Then put that into archive.org and find it preserved for you. I don't know if this works for ALL of his posts but it works at least for some of them.
205 comments:
«Oldest ‹Older 201 – 205 of 205"It would appear that each individual apostle was at best infallible only at times. "
I can infallibly predict a coin toss 50% of the time.
Hahaha, nice.
Well, what do you think was happening, in that case, in Galatians 2?
"Well, what do you think was happening, in that case, in Galatians 2?"
Just pointing out that occasional infallibility is no infallibility whatsoever.
Perhaps you need a new model for infallibility. Like oh say, infallibility in the consensus of the church? Like, that was how the Jerusalem council was able to pronounce something that seemed to be contrary to the scriptures.
If your model of infallibility doesn't work, time to reconsider?
I was originally going to post a comment asking if there was a place to see DavidW's arguments, as his linked blog is no longer online, nor is it available via archive.org. However, shortly beforehand, I actually did manage to find it, sort of. It was moved to "piousfabrications.com" (rather than "piousfabrications.blogspot.com") which is also no longer available but its articles at least seem to be preserved on archive.org. So if you want to find them, swap out "piousfabrications.blogspot.com" with "piousfabrications.com" (leave the rest of the URL intact), then go to archive.org and put that URL in. So, for example, his opening statement links to:
http://piousfabrications.blogspot.com/2009/08/sola-scriptura-debate-opening-statement.html
So if you do what I suggested, you will end up with:
http://piousfabrications.com/2009/08/sola-scriptura-debate-opening-statement.html
Then put that into archive.org and find it preserved for you. I don't know if this works for ALL of his posts but it works at least for some of them.
Thank you. I have changed the links.
Post a Comment